Musings of Truman Capote.

For ages I’ve been swayed to check out the writings of Truman Capote, but for ages I have been preoccupied to do so. Tonight I finally sat down with Portraits and Observations: The Essays of Truman Capote and am already won over.

I particularly liked this passage from “New York 1946″

Lunch today with M. Whatever is one to do about her? She says the money is gone finally, and unless she goes home, her family refuses absolutely to help . Cruel, I suppose, but I told her I did not see the alternative. On one level, to be sure, I do not think going home is possible for her. She belongs to the sect most swiftly, irrevocably trapped by New York, the talented untalented; too acute to accept a more provincial climate, yet not quite acute enough to breathe more freely in the one so desired, they go along neurotically feeding upon the fringes of the New York scene.

Only success, and that at a perilous peak, can give relief, but for artists without art, it is always tension without release, irritation with no resulting pearl.  Possibly there would be if the pressure to succeed were not so tremendous.  They feel compelled to prove something, because middle-class America, from which they mostly spring, has withering words for its men of feeling, for its young of experimental intelligence, who do not show immediately that these endeavors pay off on a cash basis.  But if a civilization falls, is it cash they find among the ruins? Or is it a statue, a poem, a play?

Which is not to say the world owes M., or anyone, a living; alas, the way things are with her, she most likely could not make a poem, a good one that is; still she is important, her values are balanced by more than the usual measure of truth, she deserves a finer destiny than to pass from belated adolescence to premature middle age, with no intervening period, and nothing to show.

-Truman Capote.

He sure knows how to tell it.

Perfume of the Dead

Interesting article that I discovered via Immortal Marilyn


Perfume’s heaven scent: New ‘Antiquity’ fragrances based on DNA of dead celebs

BY Nancy Dillon
NEWS WEST COAST BUREAU CHIEF

Tuesday, November 17th 2009, 4:00 AM
Peculiar perfume line features DNA-linked scents of a veritable constellation of luminaries, including Marilyn Monroe and Albert Einstein.
Kornman/AP, Clyde Fisher
Peculiar perfume line features DNA-linked scents of a veritable constellation of luminaries, including Marilyn Monroe and Albert Einstein.

LOS ANGELES – Get ready for Eau de Elvis.

A Beverly Hills company is formulating a line of “Antiquity” fragrances based on the DNA of dead celebrities including Elvis Presley, Albert Einstein, Marilyn Monroe, Michael Jackson – even Richard Nixon.

The firm, which also makes individualized scents based on a customer’s cheek swab, says it’s conjuring the star potions from DNA tests performed on hair clippings provided by renowned celebrity hair collector John Reznikoff.

“I can’t go into our secret process, but we base the fragrance on the genetic code,” said Dr. Diva Verdun, chief development officer at MyDNAFragrance.com.

Verdun conceded buyers aren’t getting a tangible piece of their deceased idol’s biology in the bottle, admitting that “you couldn’t do a reverse DNA analysis off of the perfume.” But she vowed the process is scientific.

“I did a little research on Elvis, and he actually had really bad body odor. So we don’t want to clone him in any way or create a fragrance that actually smelled like him,” she said. “DNA has nothing to do with bodily functions. There’s no way it can stink.”

Some skeptical experts said the type of DNA test used for old hair clippings wouldn’t reveal much we don’t already know about our icons.

“It’s the least precise form of testing, only tracking the maternal branch of your family tree. But it can give a sense of your deep ancestry, say if you’re Native American or Asian,” genealogy expert and Ancestry.com spokeswoman Megan Smolenyak told the Daily News. “I’m just scratching my head here.”

The Antiquity line is $59.99 per sculpted aluminum bottle and available online. The company hopes to begin deliveries in the next few months.

“It’s very scientific. They are working toward evoking the individual represented in the DNA,” Reznikoff told The News. “It’s far from an astrology reading.”

ndillon@nydailynews.com

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2009/11/17/2009-11-17_perfumes_heaven_scent_new_fragrances_based_on_dna_of_dead_celebrities.html#ixzz0Zb9pg0HL

#1 Photoshop Marilyn studies.

So as I am sure I’ve probably stated before, Marilyn Monroe is such a ridiculously hard image to work with.  You get that with any cultural icon, because icon alone is such a loaded word.  The entire subject its filled with layers and layers of meaning, opinions, facts, fiction, and associations.  I can’t figure out if its more loaded dealing with her inside the art world or inside the hollywood/biographical world, but then I remember the lack of seperation.

I’ve realized I primarily need to just organize and work with the oodles if information I have.  She is so overworked, discussed, and represented that it’s hard to actually separate from it all and deal with her image in a meaningful artist manner.  At times it seems impossible.  Organization, working, drawing, writing.  I need to keep at it.

I also need to not just isolate myself to the subject matter either.  It leads to my brain getting stuck.

So on the topic of unstucking brain/and organizing Marilyn images, I’m doing some quick photoshop studies, and will probably be posting them here.   As far as actual physical drawing, I am still working with doing studies of her  to get her image down straight and properly.  Then I will have the freedom to use her as please artistically.   These photoshop studies are simple ways to to play/organize with images of her and help articulate some thoughts.

Again, attempting to organize my brain and my at, and this blog helps.

"Is this thing on?"

First Art Show and Indirect Communicating

Right now some of my art is being exhibited at my work, the Hot Chocolate Sparrow in Orleans. This is the first time a body of my work has been exhibited outside of art school. I was nervous, I was intimidated, and initially I was flat out afraid.

This isn’t art school anymore. This is the real world. While it’s a cafe rather than a gallery setting, it’s still setting my work out to the public. Not just the public, but an audience I previously hadn’t exposed my work to. Cape Cod folks….which is a hard culture to describe in itself.

The amazing part is, the show has been well received. There’s something redeeming about working at my cafe-customer-service job and having the customers compliment me as an artists. It’s comforting having pretty much all my coworkers come up to me and exclaim how much they love my work. It’s reassuring to have conversations about the work, and having people get it. People that aren’t just my best friends who understand my brain, but rather people I never knew I had much in common with.

That is the greatest and most exciting thing of all. Realizing that yes, my work can connect with people. It’s such a surreal feeling.

To top it off, I found out an artist I admire likes my work. Last fall, while interning at the Provincetown Art Association and Museum, there was one artist’s work that I really connected with. Selina Trieff. Her paintings captivated me. It turns out, she came into the show and said that I “have some talent’. This is one of the things I love about art, the connection. We both independently saw each other’s work and we both connected with it, oblivious that the other person had connected with our own work. I’ve had a similar thing happen while doing Marilyn Monroe research. I was reading the book “Life Among the Cannibals” by David Marshall, and while reading the book he contacted me saying he found my work very powerful. I’ve also now been in contact with another author who’s work I love, Tara Hanks. Turns out, she likes me Marilyn work as well.

The idea of the anti-social tortured artist is bullshit. Art is communication, and I think sometimes I bury myself in theory and overthinking and my own mind. It’s really extraordinairily simple. In the age of facebook, twitter, blogs, texts, and almost every possible form of nearly instant communication……sometimes we forget that a painting, performance, or a books aren’t at all an outdated form of communication. In fact, they still manage to trump all that shit.

Introducing this blog, and a positive aspect of Marilyn Monroe’s commericialism

I’ve been engaged in research/an all-encompassing artistic endeavor on Marilyn Monroe for the past year or so. I never expected that Marilyn, of all people, would draw me in so thoroughly and completely. Part of this blog will be documentation of this research, and my artistic progress. Also, most likely part of this blog will also just be babble. One of the questions I get most often is “Why Marilyn Monroe?” I wish there was a way for me to conciencsely answer this question, but because of the profound impact she’s had on me…there isn’t.

For now, and for starters, here is one snitbit of one of the facets of Marilyns affect on me.

Marilyn Monroe is a constant. I’ve lost a mother, a brother, a cousin, friend, but Marilyn was never alive in my lifetime to lose. I have never had to deal with her image being removed from a household, and having to search deep emotional pockets in my brain to conjure up a memory of his/her image. Marilyn is everywhere. Forty-seven years and her ‘existence’ seems even more permanent. When life feels fleeting and chaotic, Marilyn’s image remains my glimmering constant….on t-shirts, purses, magazines, buildings, museums, on the tv, and most importantly…in my own mind.

A rare positive aspect to the commericialzation of MM

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 160 other followers